SW Radio Africa speaks to Mr. Felix Eimer who says he was recently contacted by the daughter of Vice President Joice Mujuru, Nyasha del Campo, who tried to set up a deal involving illegal gold from the DRC.
SW Radio Africa Hot Seat Transcript
The history of the Democratic Republic of Congo has always been one of greed and corruption. In 1998 a 5 year conflict erupted between government forces, backed by Angola , Namibia and Zimbabwe , against rebels backed by Uganda and Rwanda . The fighting was fuelled by the enormous mineral wealth of the DRC and everyone took advantage of the chance to plunder the natural resources, which included gold and diamonds.
Nyasha and Pedro del Campo, diamonds and gold
The war has been described as Africa ’s world war and Robert Mugabe’s support in this conflict saw the beginning of the collapse of Zimbabwe ’s economy, when he committed Zimbabwean troops to the conflict. An estimated 5 million people died in the DRC , mainly because of the humanitarian crisis that resulted.
For it’s support, Zimbabwe was given a number of concessions by the DRC government, that allowed it to plunder the vast natural resources of the country, including gold and diamonds. A United Nations report and another report by Global Witness, detailed the criminal activities that resulted. The reports clearly showed that Zimbabwe ’s ruling elite and all the senior defence force officials were, and still are, involved in the plunder. In August 2002 United Nations investigations revealed a memorandum from the Defence Minister Sidney Sekeramayi, to Robert Mugabe, proposing that a joint Zimbabwe- DRC company be set up in Mauritius , to disguise the continuing economic interests of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces in the DRC . The UN report showed that an elite network of Congolese and Zimbabwean political, military and commercial interests transferred ownership of at least US$5 billion of assets from the State mining sector to private companies under its control, with no compensation or benefit for the State treasury of the DRC .
Unfortunately this plunder continues and in Hotseat we speak to Mr. Felix Eimer who says he was recently contacted by the daughter of Vice President Joice Mujuru, Nyasha del Campo, who tried to set up a deal involving illegal gold from the DRC . She and her husband Pedro live in Madrid in Spain and have set up two companies, allegedly with the help and financial support of her mother.
The company who were offered this gold is Firstar Europe, a company which trades in raw materials.
I first asked Mr. Eimer to explain what had happened.
FE: OK I’m working with a company called Firstar. Basically I am involved in the steel trading with Iraq and through my network, and a gold deal was proposed to me that was initiated by Nyasha del Campo and I’ve got several documents about this deal which was gold from the Congo and as I’m not specialist in these kind of commodities I’ve sent the whole document to the company, to Firstar and their due diligence had the result that there’s a high criminal background and this gold is illegal blood gold from Congo. This is the basic line and when I talked to that fact with Nyasha, she told me that it’s no problem, we can change the origin of the gold to gold from Kenya and this was the point where everyone of us was very concerned.
GJ: Can you just clarify, because from some of the documents that I’ve seen it would appear that Nyasha is living in Spain with her Spanish husband and that they have two companies and they are involved in quite a lot of this. Would that be correct?
FE: Yeah, they are doing a lot of commodity tradings, all commodities like diamonds where Africa ’s very strong, diamonds, gold, DT fuel and I’ve not really got the point how these companies interact. The only thing I know is that her mother is financing all these companies and in our case, she wanted to finance the transport to Zurich of the gold which costs about 150 to 200 thousand US dollars
GJ: What alerted you initially to the fact that this was not a legal deal?
FE: OK as I told you before, I’m not a specialist in that case and as I had all the documents collected on my table I sent it to Firstar which has a high political background on the board of directors and they have the possibilities to do a really deep due diligence and the result of the due diligence was that all the people involved, all the passports I’ve got for the visas they needed to enter Zurich, to enter Switzerland, the result was that all this background, the gold is blood gold and these people are highly criminal people, even they are known at several organisations, so this has all been the result of Firstar’s due diligence work. This is not the result from my work.
GJ: For people who don’t deal in these areas, can you explain how a deal like this works? Why would people like this have to travel to Zurich , to Switzerland ?
FE: OK this special case, the gold from Africa is brought to Switzerland by aeroplane and then it is brought to the refineries and after the refinery you have the result how much is the value of the gold and then the transaction, the bank transaction, the payment transaction is directly done between the seller and the buyer in Zurich. In this case in Zurich because the refinery is in Zurich . So both parties have to be at this place to organise payment, to organise the completion of the transaction.
GJ: You are talking specifically about gold here, but you mentioned diamonds at the beginning as well. Was there anything more to do with a diamond transaction?
FE: The diamond transaction was done separately. I stopped it from the beginning because I wanted to concentrate on one transaction and as I had this information about this criminal background I stopped the diamond transaction so I don’t have any deeper knowledge about the origin or anything concerning this diamond deal.
GJ: Now some of the documents I’ve seen include photographs of gold nuggets. Are those photographs that Nyasha sent to you?
FE: Yep. Those pictures were sent to us, to me to my table from Nyasha, right.
GJ: So what are we saying, that Nyasha’s actually sitting in her office or at home with tin buckets full of gold nuggets?
FE: No, these nuggets, these gold nuggets are actually located, this is my knowledge, this is what Nyasha told me, are located in Nairobi at the airport ready to transport. But the origin of the gold is from Congo and the gold had to be transported from Nairobi to Zurich and the last issue was that her mother financed or wanted to finance these transports and had already released the funds for that, but the gold is physically in Africa .
GJ: Since this began, have you learnt anymore about Nyasha and how she operates with her family or have you had any dealings with Mrs Mujuru herself or have you only been dealing with Nyasha?
FE: I have been dealing with Nyasha directly and know that her mother is behind all these deals and she is financing all these deals and she is giving the possibilities to her daughter to access to all these deals, to get contact to the people that are high criminal. I mean this is the background and she is trying to help her daughter to start up a business selling commodities from Africa like gold and diamonds to Europe or to investors. At the end of the day, I only know that Firstar’s office had contact with Mrs Mujuru but not me personally.
GJ: Is there any way, in your opinion, that these diamonds and this gold could in any way be legal?
FE: In my opinion, when someone tells you that he can change the origin, the origin of the gold that comes from Congo , the only reason that someone does this is that the gold is from criminal background. This is my personal opinion. Because there is no need to change any origin if the gold is not bloody.
GJ: I do have to ask you of course why would you and your company at this stage be willing to tell the world about what is happening here because it is unusual that anyone is so open about illegal transactions that have been offered to them.
FE: OK so this came from the company directly, from the board of directors, as I told you there are a lot of high level politicians on the board of directors and this is a very straight company, they don’t want to do any illegal deals and with that, they try to get these people out of the market. They do it because they will try to sell it to other companies and in this way they try to circumvent other people to get into this transaction. This is the reason why Firstar management decided to go to the media.
GJ: If these allegations are true this must surely not be the first time that the Mujurus and Nyasha have tried to do this. Could people assume that there are deals going on with other companies at this time and have been going on for sometime?
FE: Yes I know that because the broker market in this special segment is very small and I know that they have tried to sell this gold that we refused because of the criminal background, to other companies, to other buyers and to other investors. That is true, we know that, I know that and this has also been the motivation why Firstar decided to go to the press, to the media. Also due to the fact that actually the situation, the political situation in Zimbabwe is very unstable and yeah, this is more a personal motivation from the management of Firstar to do this.
GJ: This particular transaction that we are talking about, this one gold transaction, is it a large amount of gold, is this a big amount of money?
FE: Yeah, this is a big amount of money.
GJ: Can you give me any idea of what sort of amount we’re talking about?
FE: The total transaction is about 35 to 40 million US dollars.
GJ: And that’s just this one transaction and as far as you understand there would have been others?
FE: Yeah, it was planned to do it on a monthly basis, so to sell this amount with a value of 35 to 40 million US dollars on a monthly basis, so to make one transaction each month. This was planned from the…….. this was the proposition from Nyasha del Campo’s side.
GJ: Do you have any idea if Nyasha’s husband is involved in this as well, because I see from the documents that he’s set up the companies with her. Is he just being used in this case or is he an active participant as well?
FE: He is active. Nyasha is in Madrid . She is coordinating the whole paperwork and her husband, Pedro del Campo, is in Africa and is organising the whole infrastructure like transport of the gold, making the meetings in Africa , meeting the people that are selling the gold because they are not owner of the gold, they just have access to this gold. And he is the one that is in Africa and that is organising all the infrastructure. So he is active part of the companies.
GJ: Do you feel in any way concerned about your safety with the fact that you are now revealing these details?
FE: Yes, a little bit. I mean, if I would live in South Africa, I would not talk open about that, but as I am living in Germany I am feeling concerned but I’m not feeling, I mean, I think that I am safe here but I guess that these people that are dealing with illegal gold, with weapons and stuff like that this is dangerous and I would not do this interview if I would be in another country……….
GJ: That was Mr. Felix Eimer who was willing to be interviewed about these allegations. We were hoping to speak to another representative of the company Firstar but this interview was declined because of security concerns. The gentleman in question did say that he had had a direct threat from Joice Mujuru herself after they set up a company blacklist that included Nyasha del Campo, her husband Pedro, and Joice Mujuru. He said that Mrs. Mujuru told him that if they were not taken off the black list – he would be ‘visited’ in the next couple of weeks.
We tried phoning Nyasha del Campo, but could not get through, so we emailed her and her husband, to which we received an email response from a Mr. Dancor Spies, of TAU refineries, who claimed that he was the sole principal of the alleged gold transaction and that Nyasha and her husband have no executive authority and so he would respond to questions.
But a representative of Firstar says that Mr. Spies told him that he represented Joice Mujuru herself.
We await further response from Mr. Spies.
SW Radio Africa


dzakagara dziri mbava
what do you expect from a corrupt family,like parents like children.she is not alone its a family thing no wonder why these people stick to Mugabe like a lychee.
This woman looks exactly like her father, spitting image!! Both conduct and face, igororo rakafana nebaba wacho gororo guru!!!
That’s true Simbombino!
The girl is ugly. She looks like a cross between that animal from the tv series Beauty and the beast and the Predator in those action movies.
I wonder if the Spaniard guy married her for the access to stealing created by her parents coz a thing that ugly belongs up a tree somewhere in the Matusadonha national park.
And before anyone says beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, please behold her properly…..and then behold again. She is not just ugly, she is oogly.
She is uglier than her mother. Big Nose. The nose maketh and breaket beauty. HA HA HA HA HA
Dear Editor.
This interview with Eimer is the biggest load of lies and deceit.
Here is my reply to the Radio Station.
Dear Mr. Jackson
I refer to your email as well as to the articles on your website and your interview with Mr Felix Eimer from the company Firstar in Switzerland.
I further apologize for the bulkiness of this mail.
I also plead your objectivity and neutrality in the evaluation and reporting of this matter. I would be obliged should you extend to us the same courtesy as you did to Firstar, to publish this answer to Firstar’s inaccurate allegations, on your website and discuss it on your show.
I hereby confirm and attest that the content of this document is a true, factual, and an accurate reflection, to the best of my abilities, of the dealings and events pertaining to Firstar. Reference made to Firstar; inter alia include both Mr. Urs Bernd Hagemann and Mr Felix Eimer. All emails or part thereof inserted are done so verbatim. Should it be required, the contents and any attachment hereto will be made available voluntarily for any forensic audit and verification.
From a personal perspective, I can assure you that I have not and will NEVER get or be involved in ANY disreputable transaction as I have worked and studied too long and too hard to sacrifice my life and career for any dubious character or transaction, regardless. Furthermore, I am not in the employ of anyone, nor am I for sale, nor do I have anything to hide or to be ashamed of, nor do I dance to anyone’s tune.
I also say openly and publicly that I, neither anyone that I am involved with;
• Have any criminal record of any kind or any such pending court case in any country of operation.
• Is not part or have taken part in any elicit and illegal syndicates of any organised crime or any crime syndicates.
• Is not involved or have been involved in money laundering.
• Is not a drug user or a drug dealer.
• Is not a military hardware, weaponry, or arms dealer.
• Is not a supporter, member, sleeping member, or sympathiser or any subversive or revolutionary internationally declared terrorist organization.
Although I know of Mrs Mujuru and who she is, I have never in my life met her, spoken to her or dealt with her in ANY way or fashion. Quite frankly Mr. Jackson, I am convinced that Mrs Mujuru is totally unaware even of my existence. Mr Hageman’s devious claim therefore that I told him that I am acting as an agent or principal for Mrs Mujuru is totally void of all truth and is rejected with contempt. The fact that she is the mother of Mrs Del Campo is purely academic of nature and has no bearing, relevance, or any significance in my life whatsoever.
As part of my personal quest to eradicate the indiscriminate use of mercury and cyanide in the gold industry in Africa, my excursions in Africa, the past nine years, resulted in me meeting the Presidents and the relevant Ministers of the top eight gold producing countries in Africa of which I maintain a very good relationship. With all due respect, why would I then attach myself to or be associated with someone that forms an integral part of a despot Government to the likes of Zimbabwe?
Firstar knew exactly who they were dealing with from the outset as my professional profile is on the Internet for anyone to see. In fact, they “googled” me several times during the period, of which I got reports from my service provider with region and IP address info of the search originator. Pertinent to note, in the press release sent to you by Firstar they refer to me as the “Principal of Nyasha and Pedro Del Campo” yet Mr. Eimer not once referred to me in your interview. I wonder why?
The Del Campo’s are Commodity Traders or often referred to as Brokers, more so Mrs Nyasha Del Campo (Sugar, Grain, Cement, Rice, Fuel, Coal, Steel, Rubber, Minerals, Equipment, etc) and they conduct their business through a proper and legally registered company Onesafara International based in Spain. They, more so Mr Pedro Del Campo, are also involved and busy with various “Green” Projects (Bio Diesel, Renewable Energy, Thermal Electricity, Tyre Recycling, Game Parks, Protected Animal, and Bird Species, Crop Cultivation, NGO’s etc.) in various African Countries. Nothing sinister or illegal or criminal.
With reference to the company Berline Equities Corp. This is a company registered in Switzerland and has been dormant since inception. Furthermore, the only reason why Onesafara and Berline Equities were used with regards to the transaction was purely from a convenience point of view as it was existing good and clean companies with an infrastructure which I did not have at the time in Europe. Once again, nothing sinister or illegal or criminal.
For the purpose of the gold transaction under scrutiny, the Del Campo’s were appointed by me as intermediaries. The sole function of an intermediary is to bring the buyer and seller around the same table at the same time. This entails that an intermediary present the transaction as well as making all the initial contact and communication with the potential buyer/client. It is therefore not unusual for, like in Mr. and Mrs. Del Campo’s case, to speak and communicate with the client, in this case, Firstar.
For that service, an intermediary earns a commission. The norm in the industry is one or two percent of the value of such transaction shared amongst intermediaries on the “Seller Side” and one or two percent shared amongst intermediaries on the “Buyer Side” and not the “Millions of Dollar” as referred to by Mr. Eimer in the interview. In fact, Firstar would have made many more “Millions of Dollars” had this transaction materialise, than all the intermediaries put together. The bulk of the money, +/- 90% of the value of the gold gets paid to the owner of the gold in the country of origin. I am dismayed and utterly disgusted at the blatant misleading and ambiguous lies that now, by virtue of remote association, suddenly turned us into gunrunners.
Intermediaries normally have fairly limited authority and knowledge of the intricate detail of such transactions and are therefore not uncommon for minor misrepresentations and or misunderstandings to occur. It also does occur that an intermediary, with the initial contact with a potential client, makes or leaves the impression, that he/she is, rightly or wrongly, indeed the Principal.
Experienced Buyers of commodities are normally very well versed and as a rule insist to be introduced and or work and communicate directly on a Principle to Principle basis. Furthermore, experienced traders of commodities would normally insist to see proof of appointment as Principal or Mandate by the owner. Despite numerous discussions and emails to this effect, Firstar was informed on several occasions, both verbally and per email that I am the Principal and Mandate of the transaction, and that all dealings are sanctioned by me and me alone, yet they willingly and wilfully harassed and haunted Mrs. Del Campo on a constant basis. This harassment also had a sexual undertone as suggested by Mr Eimer that he “has never been with an African lady” as he tried to persuade Mrs Del Campo to visit him in Switzerland, well knowing her husband is in Africa.
In a nutshell, a Principal or Mandate can be described as follows; a Principal is either the owner or mandated by the owner of a commodity to sell his commodity. In the instance where the Principal is not the owner, he normally gets paid a negotiated commission by the owner. In certain instances the owner could offer the commodity to the Principal at a fixed price which leaves the Principal with more flexibility to negotiate a win-win transaction with a potential Buyer. The Principal will always act as if the commodity is his property and would therefore always bear the best interest of the owner at heart and is often described as the Seller. It is therefore also not uncommon for the proceeds of a transaction to be paid into the bank account of the Principal or Mandate or Pay Master, for further disbursement of commissions and costs as well as payment to the owner of the commodity. Structuring of transactions of any kind is virtually limitless in substance and execution.
Worthy to note; two weeks after my appointment as Principal and Mandate did I meet Mr. Pedro Del Campo for the first time in my life after which I invited him to become involved.
By way of background; any commodity transaction is initialised or activated by a Full Corporate Offer (FCO). Please refer the example on your website. An FCO is a summary of the product on sale as well as a summary of the procedures together with an expiry date. A transaction is activated by the signing of the FCO and issuing of a Letter Of Intent (LOI) by the buyer. If you do not accept the FCO, a counter proposal can be made or outright rejected. Should a counter offer be made, it is then for the Seller to accept or reject or negotiate until all parties are satisfied. When an FCO is accepted everything then happens according to the prescribed procedures. Effectively, an FCO spells out the rules of engagement. The bottom line is – No signed FCO and LOI, No deal. As easy as that. Firstar NEVER intended to sign an FCO nor issued an LOI. Refer to the emails hereinafter.
The golden thread through all these emails can clearly be seen. Firstar did their utmost to lure us and the consignment to Zurich under the auspices and pretence that everything will be sorted out on arrival. No FCO signed and only a promise of payment. With reference to past incidences with others in similar circumstances, once in Zurich, suddenly you find yourself confronted by the authorities and arrested with the charge of trying to sell “illegal gold”. As you have no legal foot to stand on because you have no FCO, LOI and agreement with a Buyer, you get arrested and deported without your gold as the gold now gets “confiscated”. As it was the Buyer that tipped off them off, they now “buy” the gold from corrupt officials for a fraction of the real value. Many legitimate sellers of gold from Africa lost their gold this way, and yes, even in Switzerland, thanks to companies to the likes Firstar.
With regards to the so-called illegal gold. The gold in question, originated from a very reputable mine in the Katanga Province (Southern DRC bordering Zambia and Angola) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) with all required export taxes and duties paid to the DRC Government. As the gold was in transit through Kenya, all required taxes, and levies was also paid to the Kenyan authorities.
Furthermore, gold originating from the DRC is neither illegal nor illicit nor is there any embargo or resolution either from the African Union or the United Nations. I might add that there are Gold Refineries in Europe that does not accept gold from the DRC, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Central African Republic, Somalia, (War zones) etc. This however is exclusively a decision made on Company (Refinery) level, in my opinion not always consequent in the execution but obviously there right to do so. The only reason they do so is that they want to be seen to be in occupation of the moral high ground. This stance of the Refineries in Europe is normally enforced and applicable to any new potential supplier of gold, with an unknown track record. Existing and regular suppliers of gold to these Refineries does not have such problem and they accept gold from these known sellers regardless of origin.
Also, the gold in question was free and clear of any liens and encumbrances and is of non-criminal and non-terrorist origin and there is no past dues or taxes and levies whatsoever owed to and by any Authority or Government concerned. In addition, I am also authorized and fully licensed to buy, sell, and export gold by the Authorities of the countries concerned. With this as background, to therefore change the origin of the commodity at will and “on demand” is totally ludicrous, sucked from his thumb and very far removed from to the statement made by Mr. Eimer during your interview.
I find it strange that Firstar claims that it was “illegal” gold as the Full Corporate Offer (FCO) (not a Free Corporate Offer as referred to in their Press Release) that was sent to them, clearly and in Bold indicted the origin of the gold as that of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Firstar also have in their possession, certified copies of the Certificate of Origin, Certificate of Ownership, Certificate of Assay, Certificate of Authority to Export, Tax Clearance Certificate etc. Furthermore, the fact that the gold originated from the DRC was never obscured or disguised or concealed. Clearly, this would have been otherwise were there any dubious criminal intent or attempt to either mislead or deceive.
Interesting to note; the accusation that we tried to sell “illegal” gold was levelled at us only as late as the 9th December 2008 whilst they received the first FCO the 5th of November 2008. I also find it very strange that Firstar, well aware of the fact that the gold originated from the DRC for more than a month, were fully, enthusiastically, and vigorously prepared to buy this “illegal” gold all along. They even resorted to blatant extortion, blackmail, and blatant racism. Their offensive racially prejudice and insults (refer to emails hereinafter) went on well beyond the termination and suspension of communication. Only when I insisted that they need to prove that they are in fact in a financial position to pay for the consignment did the deal turn sour, and they then reverted to the “illegal gold” accusation. Why was the “Illegal” status of the gold not an issue prior to me insisting that they prove funds as they were fully prepared to buy the gold coming from the DRC? Does this then not also make Firstar an accessory and accomplice to the “illegal trade in gold”?
Furthermore, should gold from the DRC indeed be classified as “illegal” then surely Firstar should have declined the Full Corporate Offer from the outset as this would have been common knowledge for experienced gold buyers like Firstar which is “one among 100,000 buyers” as Mr Eimer stated in his email of the 24th November 2008. It would also not have been required of Firstar to do a “deep due diligence” (that took this “big” company more than a month to “conclude”), as he so eloquently put it during your interview with him.
The only real reason why this gold suddenly turned “illegal” was to enable Mr. Eimer to save his own standing within Firstar and also as a cover up for his lack of knowledge, experience, and expertise. According to their website, Firstar is a corporate company. To any Corporate Company it is all about the “bottom line”. The real and true facts of the matter is that Firstar forward sold the gold consignment on a back to back transaction more that 3 weeks prior to the termination of communications, to an American Company.
In addition, Firstar has never been in the financial position to buy the gold themselves and relied on the American Buyers to provide the funding. This fact was admitted by Mr Eimer during a conversation with Mrs Zoe Saenz. Mrs. Zoe Saenz was approached by Mr. Eimer to enter the negotiations as an arbiter cum peacemaker to salvage the transaction as she was the person that introduced Mrs. Del Campo to Firstar. She was also abruptly and unceremoniously blacklisted by Firstar the following day. Even well after the blacklisting, Mr. Eimer tried frantically and hysterically to persuade Mrs. Saenz to help to salvage the transaction. See emails hereinafter.
The proverbial cat was thrown amongst the pigeons when I insisted on proving that they can pay. They then resorted to treacherous tactics to blacklist all involved to try and force me to sell the gold to them, after which, the names would then be removed from the blacklist. See emails hereinafter.
Also, during a conversation between me and Mr. Eimer, upon a direct question put to the young man, whether he has ever done a gold transaction, he boasted in the affirmative that he in fact has done several gold transactions in the past with distinction and that he is also an authority in the identification of fake or false documentation especially originating from the DRC. From the DRC? His claims are now to the contrary, in your interview with him and very far removed from what he bragged about.
I refer to the comment made in your interview with regards to the alleged threat to the life and safety of “the gentleman in question” from Firstar. Logic dictates as well as in evaluating all probabilities, and in all fairness to all parties:
• Mrs Joice Mujuru as well as her husband has been blacklisted by multiple high profile Governments, organisations, and institutions worldwide due to their direct involvement with the Government of the tyrannical ruler Mugabe.
• Now why would she directly phone Firstar and “the gentleman in question” Mr. Urs Bernd Hagemann? It is similar to a dead person that cannot die twice. The fact that she was blacklisted by Firstar would have had a zero detrimental, negative, or harmful effect in her life as she depends on absolutely nothing from Firstar. Furthermore, taking into consideration Mr. Hagemann’s status and stature in the world, unlike his own opinion of himself, a nincompoop, and incriminate her to this extent by threatening his life?
• Surely, upon receiving a threat like that, the immediate involvement of the Police would, as a norm, be sought and they in turn would seek the assistance of Interpol. Surely Firstar should have record of such conversation or at least evidence of such case reported to their relevant authority.
• My personal opinion is that Firstar is employing the truth in extreme moderation and clearly and obviously wants to create the perception that they are now dealing with real dangerous gun wielding “cloak and dagger” stuff.
With reference to the document [Mails-from-Seller-NyashadelCampo.pdf] as can be seen, all reference to Firstar, Mr. Hagemann, and Mr Eimer has suddenly disappeared, when compared to the original emails. All emails are addressed to a person with the name of “Anthony” also with references to a person with the name of “Mike”. Apart from the obvious subtle and creative modifications and alterations, I further notice that the letter to the Journalists was sent by anthony.dexten@googlemail.com. I therefore can safely assume the “Anthony” is indeed Anthony Dexten.
Neither I, nor anyone in my team has ever heard, spoken or communicated with a “Mike” or an “Anthony” or communicated with anthony.dexten@googlemail.com.
In fact, upon telephonic enquiries, there is no Mike or Anthony Dexten in the employ of Firstar. Non other than the old goat MR URS BERND HAGEMANN himself, the so-called Vice President of Firstar is answering and responding to the email anthony.dexten@googlemail.com. Hallo Anthony!!! (Or is it Mike with the assistance of Anthony?)
Firstar in truth are still busy with their underhanded tactics. It is for that very reason they are using you and your radio station as a willing and able participant and vehicle to achieve their smear campaign objectives.
Firstar blatantly, deliberately and fraudulently;
• altered and falsified the contents of the emails sent by Mrs. Del Campo and others, as per document published on your website [Mails-from-Seller-NyashadelCampo.pdf] to create the impression that her mother is funding this operation as well as other subtle and devious “modifications”. This is fraud of the 1st degree.
• hacked and gained unauthorised access to my and others’ mailboxes to get copies of confidential Company documentation as well as the FCO sent by Onesafara to Dynamic Solutions in South Africa. See copy of FCO on your website. This is Industrial Espionage and theft of the 1st degree.
• misinformed you, your listeners and your surfers with fabricated misrepresentations and unashamed lies in the interview with Mr. Eimer.
• portrayed all people and companies on their “blacklist” as dangerous terrorists, gunrunners, money launderers and criminals that has defrauded, conned and duped Firstar and other companies.
• insulted, tarnished and tainted our reputation, character, integrity, credibility and good standing which constitutes libel, defamation, slur, slander, vilification, character assassination resulting in real loss of income.
First contact made with Firstar on Wednesday the 5th November 2008 after a telephone conversation between Mr. Del Campo and Mr. Hagemann.
NOTE: Senders indicted as both Dancor Spies and Pedro Del Campo.
Von: Pedro del Campo [mailto:pedro@onesafara.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 13:53
An: hagemann@firstar.eu
Cc: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’
Betreff: Telephonic discussion
Dear Mr. Hagermann,
I refer to our telephonic discussion of earlier today.
To be able to move the consignment in a first batch of 50 kilograms we need to convince the advocates of your ability to pay for the total consignment (3700 Kilograms). We therefore friendly request proof of funds to present to the Advocates as well as a commitment to pay for the consignment on arrival and after assay by the destination refinery.
Please give it your urgent attention as this is a non exclusive FCO.
Yours Sincerely
Pedro del Campo / Dancor Spies
De: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Enviado el: miércoles, 05 de noviembre de 2008 16:43
Para: pedro@onesafara.com
CC: hagemann@firstar.eu; ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’
Asunto: Zürich / Gold / 50 KG
Dear Mr. Campo, dear Mr. Spies,
It is also in our interest to make the deal as sure as possible for both sides.
We want to give a short resume from our point of view:
1.) You have sent us documentation and pictures of / about the gold
2.) We have sent you our company profile
Firstar is a well known company and the board of directors is impressive. The fact you deal with Firstar should be enough to convince your lawyers:
The board of directors (Firstar):
- Founded by Wayne Mixson (former governor of Florida)
- Chairman, Rudolf Krauss (member of German Parliament / Deputy Minister under Chancellor Helmut Kohl)
- Jürgen Schornack: Manager of the State secretariat
- Chairman Bill Grant (former president of the Florida Bankers association / Advisor to many of the American and Iraqi personalities)
- CEO, Musihi Al Haschimi
- Vice President Salah Y Gizeer
- Vice President Udo Hagemann
At this point both sides have shown their ability to perform at equal level.
The next logic step is a top table meeting.
Our directive does allow us to send sensitive bank documents upfront through the world wide web.
You are invited to Zürich or our offices in Berlin to have a look at these bank documents upfront if you don’t feel safe.
In our opinion you have no risk if you take a small amount to Zürich Airport (Free Zone) and complete the transaction there.
If the proposed commodity “GOLD” suits to the FCO we can close the first (small) deal on Friday in Zürich.
During our TTM we will of course deliver bank documents in order to complete the rest of the transaction.
We can propose you to fortify your position in front of your lawyers in sending an official document with our interest to you.
In combination with the name Firstar you are safe.
We are ready to fulfil the transaction on Friday in Zürich at 2 PM.
Please let us know if you agree and correct the FCO so we can allocate the funds and give you details for Friday.
Best regards,
Felix Eimer
Europe – United Kingdom
215 Wilderspool Causeway
Warrington – Cheshire
WA4 6QE United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 161 480 25 22
Skype: firstar.europe
E-mail: info@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.eu
________________________________________
Von: Nyasha Onesafara International [mailto:nyasha@onesafara.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2008 16:33
An: Firstar
Betreff: RE: Zürich / Gold / 50 KG
Dear Felix
If your organisation can provide the proof of funds via the world wide web as you said that would give us a bit more leverage with the lawyers, your credentials are fantastic and we are sure this will help a bit more.
Thnak you
Nyasha
________________________________________
De: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Enviado el: miércoles, 05 de noviembre de 2008 18:38
Para: pedro@onesafara.com
CC: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’
Asunto:
Dear Mr. Campo,
Referring to our phone call we want to underline that Firstar is ready to enter the proposed deal.
If all facts correlate with your FCO there is no doubt from our side that we can close the deal immediately. I hope you will find a solution to bring us the commodity with a “sample” of 50 kg. This is an easy and fast issue for all of us. If you feel uncomfortable concerning the POF we can offer you two solutions:
1.) We show you the bank documents during our first “50 KG” transaction
2.) We make an upfront TTM in Zürich only that you can inspect the documents
We are working transparent but we cannot send confidential documents through the web due to unfriendly actions from brokers in the past. If you have any further documents (contracts) for us fee free to send it. The more information and documentation we have the better is our overall picture.
If you reach your lawyers in the meantime we can still meet on Friday in Zürich as we have another deal going on that day.
All the best, Felix
________________________________________
De: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Enviado el: miércoles, 05 de noviembre de 2008 18:49
Para: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’
CC: hagemann@firstar.eu; pedro@onesafara.com
Asunto: AW: Zürich / Gold / 50 KG
Hi Nyasha,
Actually we try to work out a solution that is comfortable for both sides. I guess you misunderstood the writing in my mail. It is not possible to provide such kind of documents through the world wide web. But your lawyers have always the possibility to inspect these documents in Zürich. We can arrange a meeting only for that purpose (inspection of the documents). But of course it would be easier if we connect this event with the first 50 kg transaction. We try to be as transparent as possible but please understand that such confidential documents cannot be send upfront via Email. This has never a problem in the past as everyone can check Firstar. If we can support and accelerate the process with any documents such as LOI, official writing,… please let us know.
All the Best, Felix Eimer
________________________________________
De: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Enviado el: lunes, 17 de noviembre de 2008 12:05
Para: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’
CC: pedro@onesafara.com; hagemann@firstar.eu
Asunto: TIMETABLE ZÜRICH
Dear Nyasha,
Since a couple of days the deal is becoming very sticky. It is hard for us to get contact (Email, Fone, etc) to you. I don’t even get any reaction on my mails. You don’t call back when you promise it and we have no fixed date for Zürich yet. We don’t have any schedule and at this point feel uncertain if you will deliver gold to Zürich next week. We have to organise the complete infrastructure (money transfer, refinery, booking…). Please send us until today 3 PM a simple Email with the fixed time schedule. If we don’t get this information today we are not ready to follow the deal anymore.
We presented us always flexible and wanted to help you to do the deal quickly because of your and your husband’s personal situation. Please treat our group with the same respect. All we are asking is to tell us a fixed date for Zürich. I hope that you will send the information and we will have a mutual beneficial business relationship.
All the best, Felix
________________________________________
De: felix eimer [mailto:felix.eimer@googlemail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 17 de noviembre de 2008 15:17
Para: nyasha@onesafara.com
CC: pedro@onesafara.com
Asunto: LINE UP ZÜRICH 25th
Dear Nyasha, Dear Pedro,
We are ready to close the transaction next week on the 25th in Zürich. We have to organize the total infrastructure. The following steps are necessary and the minimum requirment from the company Firstar for a gold deal. Please follow this line up or tell which points are not possible to arrange in time for you:
1.) Email with the exact date when you will arrive in Zürich and the total amount of gold. Due until today
2.) A confirmation of the flights and the location of the hotel. Due until 11/18/08
3.) A paper that shows us that the gold will be transported to Zürich. Due until 11/21/08
Please dont take these steps as a mistrust of your ability to perform. When you have sent us the Email today you will get an official invitation from Firstar. The gold will be bought directly from the refinery and paid via TT. Please stay in contact with us as this is a sensible process and business.
All the best,
Felix Eimer
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:52 PM
To: fe@firstar.eu; felix.eimer@googlemail.com
Cc: ‘Pedro del Campo’; hagemann@firstar.eu; nyasha@onesafara.com
Subject: RE: TIMETABLE ZÜRICH
Dear Mr Eimer
I refer to a telephone conversation with Mr. Hagemann one week ago as well as to your emails, as attached hereunder.
We fully understand your position with regards to the issuing of a BG or a BCL. As this is one of the requirements of the supplier of the Au we have to negotiate an alternative arrangement.
Furthermore, we unexpectedly ran into a minor problem and are now in the process to rectify same.
It is VERY important to us to conduct our business ethically, correctly and legally therefore it is very difficult for us to commit to any date, as proposed by you.
Once everything, including all required paperwork to export the consignment to you, we will duly notify you, obviously with all the paperwork as proof of the legitimacy of the transaction also bearing in mind the time you require to comply and fulfill your side of the transaction.
Please bear with us until such time that we have all our ducks in a row to complete the transaction without problems.
We will immediately notify you when we are ready to proceed.
Best wishes
DANCOR SPIES
________________________________________
The first threats start.
NOTE: They did not reply or heeded the contents of my (above) mail to them.
Von: Firstar Europe [mailto:hagemann@firstar.eu]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. November 2008 21:22
An: nyasha@onesafara.com
Cc: fe@firstar.eu
Betreff: your words to us
Dear Nyasha,
All what we want was a receipt or proof. I told yesterday to Felix that I was sure that you will never send this receipt and don’t stay to your word. Now I am sure that all what you say to us was not true. You don’t send mail what you promised us, you don’t send any receipt what you promised us, you don’t send email from your lawyer what you promised us, you don’t send any transfer proof from money from your account to the lawyers account what you promised to us. It looks all like a fake. You told Firstar that we meet us first time in Zurich last week – and you cancel this meeting – after that you told us we will see us this week – and you cancel. Now you told us that we see us next week – and I am sure that you will cancel this meeting too with another brilliant excuse.
Please understand that Firstar is not a game company. We have not time for fake brokers or imaginary gold sellers. Do you know that all people that what to play with Firstar go to the US-GOV – Blacklist and to the ICC Crime Office? One of our US-chairman is the former governor of Florida Mr. Mixson. The other is Mr. Bill Grant. The Minister Rudolf Kraus (from Germany) knows about you too. All don’t play games – all are strong business people and don’t want waste time.
Please go to our international blacklist: http://www.firstar.us/blacklist
I hope that we don’t must place you there next week. If we must do it – You, your company and all people that involved in this “deal” will blacklisted by Firstar International, by ICC Crime Office and US-GOV Blacklist.
Nyasha, the problem is that you promise a lot to us and after that you don’t do what you say. If you are real, (what I don’t believe anymore) we can do good business in the future but what you have done and show us in the past was not professional from you.
Sorry for this letter, but know we need clear words and not funny games without true. I really want to believe in you, but day by day it is more and more difficult.
If you want to phone me: +49 30 40 50 60
U. Bernd Hagemann
Vice President
Europe – United Kingdom
215 Wilderspool Causeway
Warrington – Cheshire
WA4 6QE United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 161 480 25 22
Skype: firstar.europe
E-mail: info@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.eu
________________________________________
From: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:00 AM
To: ‘D.Spies’
Subject: WG: your words to us
Dear Nyasha, dear Pedro,
I am in real trouble because two meetings in Zürich have been cancelled and a lot of promises had not been fulfilled. The whole week consisted for me in calling you back and getting promises. For example today it was promised to get documents and a conference call between Nyasha, Pedro & me. I was online the whole evening. We organised the money facilities and refinery infrastructure. This costs Firstar a lot of money. If you bring us the commodity you will get direct TT payment. How would you feel if we start telling you the money maybe there in the next 24 hours and reschedule payments and do not fulfil our promises?
The deal is actually on the company US side watchlist.
And if we do not send any prove that the deal is real this will have severe consequences for you & me on the highest political level. His is no threat but the consequence I cannot avoid. This is out of my power.
The door is not closed yet but will be closed tomorrow for all of us if again nothing will happen. I cannot understand why nobody is calling me if promises are made but nothing happens.
Firstar opened you all possibilities because we have had a high trust level. In this big fake market Firstar is one among 100,000 buyers that is real. I cannot understand why you treat this big and respected company this way.
We have always been open for a dialog if you face problems.
Tomorrow is the real last chance to put things in order.
Please treat us with respect and see this email as the last chance to close the deal and le us come back to a mutual trust level.
All the best,
Felix Eimer
From: Pedro del Campo [mailto:pedro@onesafara.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 7:11 AM
To: ‘Firstar’; nyasha@onesafara.com
Cc: ‘D.Spies’
Subject: RE: your words to us
Dear Mr. Felix Eimer,
As per our last official communication sent to you last 17th of November, the time we are ready to offer you under the premises you have dictate to us we will immediately contact you officially again. I herewith attached such communication.
We understand you couldn’t attend our initial offer FCO Nairobi from the past 5th of November.
We are working very hard from Nairobi to follow your premises.
I hope it will be very soon.
All the best,
Pedro del Campo
De: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 24 de noviembre de 2008 8:22
Para: ‘Firstar’; hagemann@firstar.eu
CC: ‘Pedro del Campo’
Asunto: RE: your words to us
Importancia: Alta
Pedro
Could you please inform me as to what this is all about ON AN EXTREMELY URGENT BASIS?
I thought I made it very clear that we will only deal with Firstar once we have everything under control.
I refer to an email sent by me on the 17th November 2008 to all parties concerned of which both you and Nyasha received a copy. Although I never got any feedback nor answer from Firstar with regards to this mail and regardless my opinion that it is not very professional conduct from their side and is not the point of discussion.
I find Hereunder an extract from this email:
“It is VERY important to us to conduct our business ethically; correctly and legally therefore it is very difficult for us to commit to any date, as proposed by you.
Once everything, including all required paperwork to export the consignment to you, we will duly notify you, obviously with all the paperwork as proof of the legitimacy of the transaction also bearing in mind the time you require to comply and fulfill your side of the transaction.
Please bear with us until such time that we have all our ducks in a row to complete the transaction without problems.
We will immediately notify you when we are ready to proceed.”
As my mail to Firstar is clear in its content and intent, who made what promises and undertakings to them without confirming such undertakings and commitments with me?
You know as well as I do that we are not in a position at this stage to make any commitment to anybody due to the problems we still need to resolve.
I refer to the email from Mr Eimer and Mr. Hagemann hereunder and see it in a very serious light.
Apart from the fact that I do not take kind to any threat, regardless, I WILL NOT AND CANNOT TOLERATE ANY ATTEMPT NOR CONDUCT BY ANYONE TO TARNISH MY NAME, MY PROJECT, STATURE, OR GOOD STANDING IN ANY FASHION WHATSOEVER.
Please revert back to me as soon as possible.
DANCOR SPIES
From: Pedro del Campo [mailto:pedro@onesafara.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 7:33 AM
To: dancor.spies@gmail.com
Subject: RE: your words to us
Good morning Dancor
No communication has been made to them. No commitment had been made to them as per my reply to them few minutes ago.
I totally agree with you and I have no answer from this people to our previous email.
My wife either has not committed anything to them.
I believe they are just anxious to get product.
I will try to call you
Regards
Pedro
From: Nyasha Onesafara International [mailto:nyasha@onesafara.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:03 AM
To: Pedro del Campo
Cc: dancor.spies@gmail.com; hagemann@firstar.eu
Subject: RE: your words to us
Dear Pedro and Dancor
I have made the mistake myself as i am the one who bought First Star into this when we thought the deal with Mullen and Dowd had fallen through because lack of the funds this has been my doing and i take full responsibility, Firstar would like to see evidence that the consignment is there and that we are processing their paperwork for their deal as they have to make an apponintmant with their refinery in Zurich, i had informed them that we still need to make payments to our lawyers in Nairobi in order to start this process and they would have to waite at least a week more for everything to be finalized, well i guess i have been misunderstood and done this the wrong way, my apologies to everyone.
nyasha
________________________________________
Von: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2008 06:44
An: ‘Firstar’
Cc: hagemann@firstar.eu
Betreff: RE: your words to us
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Dear Mr Eimer
Please be so kind as to inform me to any other promises made to you with regards to the current potential transaction in Au, other than the email that I sent you on the 17th November 2008.
Kind regards
DANCOR SPIES
From: felix.eimer@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.eimer@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:34 AM
To: dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’; pedro@onesafara.com; hagemann@firstar.eu
Subject:
Dear Mr Spies,
We did not answer your mail directly because we agreed communication through Nyasha de Campo. We did not make any pressure on the deal beside the fact that we told Nyasha del Campo the Refinery will the close the 12th of December for Christmas Holydays.
The pressure came from the ONESAFARA side as the company rescheduled the dates earlier. We have been informed on the last Tuesday that the meeting / transaction should happen today. At this point we had the fear to be in negotiations with a fake deal.
It is not our intention to discredit anyone but we now need to know the final Time Table for Zürich.
Please talk to you associates Pedro and Nyasha and come back to us as soon as possible,
All the best
Felix Eimer
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 12:18 PM
To: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’; ‘Pedro del Campo’
Subject: RE: your words to us
Importance: High
Hi Nyasha & Pedro.
Although the mail from Eimer and Hagemann was upsetting, not to what was allegedly promised by anyone, but mainly their threats and bullying tactics.
The audacity they have to threaten us simply because they are not proficient in the basics of the English language, as they clearly did not understand the mail I sent to them. They further lack the basic business etiquette to acknowledge the receipt of an email sent to them on the 17th November.
I further feel extremely offended and insulted by the mere fact that they associate us with a possibility of scammers, fakes, and imaginary gold sellers.
How can Firstar, as so called respected and successful business people, be so presumptuous and arrogant to put a deal, that have no signatures or final commitments, on “company US side watch list” which poses “severe consequence” on the “highest political level” should we fail to abide by their contemptuous demands.
All of us have sacrificed a tremendous lot to make this happen and I will therefore not for stand their threats. The world is full of real buyers and they surely are not the only ones.
Nyasha, apologies accepted unconditionally and absolute no hard feelings and also nothing to blame yourself about.
Incidents like this only strengthen the glue that holds us together as a team.
Best regards
Dancor
________________________________________
From: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:53 PM
To: dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: hagemann@firstar.eu
Subject: AW: your words to us
Dear Mr. Spies,
Thanks a lot fort he good conversation we have had. Firstar already organized the infrastructure around the gold deal for this year. Please keep us updated on the actual transaction. It is important to build up an information flow at this level of the deal even if there is no hot news.
All the best,
Felix Eimer
________________________________________
Von: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 16:20
An: fe@firstar.eu; felix.eimer@googlemail.com
Cc: ‘Pedro del Campo’; hagemann@firstar.eu; nyasha@onesafara.com
Betreff: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
Dear Mr. Hagemann and Mr. Eimer
I refer to our telephone conference conversation with you as well as a telephone conversation with Mr. Hageman on Saturday night.
Regrettable, we do not have a fixed date for the transportation of the consignment to Zurich yet.
The delays we currently experience is beyond our control as it is dependent on third parties to diligently perform their duties.
We fully realize the implications of any further delays, both on your side as well as from our side.
As discussed during our conference call, it is very important for us to do everything by the book with no room for errors.
We will inform you the minute we have everything in place.
I beg your indulgence and assure you once again of our good intentions at all time.
Best wishes
DANCOR SPIES
________________________________________
From: Firstar Europe [mailto:hagemann@firstar.eu]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:49 PM
To: ‘D.Spies’
Subject: AW: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
Dear Mr. Spies,
Thanks a lot for your update.
Please delineate us the problem you face that we can draw our on picture of the current situation.
It is important to talk in an open way to each other in order to save the good level of trust. As you know such transaction also means for us a lot of funding and infrastructure work in front. So in the interest of both sides, please kindly explain us the reason for the delay.
Bernd Hagemann
Vice President
Europe – United Kingdom
215 Wilderspool Causeway
Warrington – Cheshire
WA4 6QE United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 161 480 25 22
Skype: firstar.europe
E-mail: info@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.eu
________________________________________
Von: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2008 17:18
An: ‘Firstar Europe ‘; fe@firstar.eu
Cc: ‘Pedro del Campo’; nyasha@onesafara.com
Betreff: RE: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
Dear Sir
The current delays are caused by European Banks for the transfer of the required funds to finalize and pay for the outstanding Government taxes.
Although 80% of all fees and taxes payable to the Government has already been paid by us, the further problem was due to an oversight by the Freight Company which miscalculated the tax payment to the Government. This was a USD150 000.00 blunder which is the sole cause for our dilemma. As this is our first time to export from Kenya, we were unaware of these additional taxes.
These taxes needs to be paid before anything leaves the country, regardless.
The ultimate blame for this failure rest squarely on my shoulders as I did not do the due diligence as it should have been done, but relied on the guidance of local businessmen.
As I stated in my previous mail, we fully realize the implications of these delays and we are currently frustrated beyond comprehension.
Please be assured that we, as a team, are working tirelessly to achieve our objective.
Regards
DANCOR SPIES
________________________________________
De: Berline Equities Corp [mailto:berlineequitiescorp@gmail.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 05 de diciembre de 2008 17:25
Para: ‘hagemann@firstar.eu’
Asunto: FCO 350 Kg AU
Dear Sir,
Attached hereto please find the Full Corporate Offer as discussed.
We await for your prompt response to conclude all required paperwork.
Yours Sincerely,
Pedro del Campo
Berline Equities Corp
________________________________________
From: felix eimer [mailto:felix.eimer@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:42 PM
To: pedro@onesafara.com
Cc: nyasha@onesafara.com; hagemann@firstar.eu; dancor.spies@gmail.com
Subject: Discount
Dear Nyasha, dear Pedro, dear Dancor,
There has been a lot of miscommunication the last weeks. That is why the internal pressure @Firstar is now at a high level. This is also the reason why at a certain point we are at the edge of our negociation possibilities. CIF Zürich was agreed. I guess this wont be any problem anymore as you have all things in order now. In the first FCO we have got there was a discount of 12%. This has never been communicated differently. We are ready to adjust this discount to your advantage but not down to 6% in the context of normal business negociations. Please propose us a mutual acceptable discount starting from the first FCO. We are of course ready to deduct your upfront costs (transport, custom) from the price. We recognise that the delivery is now CIF. We will deduct all your upfront costs from the price but need on this net price a higher discount than 6%. You can be sure that Firstar will perform and you will be paid via TT and you are dealing with one of few real buyers. At this point I would ike to encourage you to stay in contact with us even if there are no hot news. I hope that everyone will now do his best to close the deal this year.
All the best from Frankfurt,
Felix Eimer
________________________________________
From: Firstar Europe [mailto:hagemann@firstar.eu]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 11:22 AM
To: dancor.spies@gmail.com; nyasha@onesafara.com; pedro@onesafara.com
Cc: fe@firstar.eu
Subject: Counter Offer
Dear Pedro, dear Dancor, dear Nyasha,
Thanks a lot for your FCO. The first FCO you have submitted had a discount of 12% and a b**** quantity of AU. We realize that you now deliver CIF, but also a lower quantity.
We are ready to purchase at 10% discount. We would like to discuss a long term contract in Zürich for the future deals with different parameters. Our company has the financial ability to purchase the total amount of gold. Please let us know your thoughts and keep in mind that this is a first deal with the goal to build up a long term business relationship and level of trust. If you agree we are still ready to close the deal in Zürich.
Bernd Hagemann
Vice President
Europe – United Kingdom
215 Wilderspool Causeway
Warrington – Cheshire
WA4 6QE United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 161 480 25 22
Skype: firstar.europe
E-mail: info@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.eu
________________________________________From: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 12:40 PM
To: ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’; pedro@onesafara.com; dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: hagemann@firstar.eu
Subject:
Hello Nyasha, Pedro, Dancor,
Here is the counter offer. This has been created regarding to our phone calls and emails.
We are wondering why BCL is in the procedure as we proposed an upfront meeting in Zürich that you can see such documents. Firstar does not send upfront bank documents through the www.
Also the payment cash against documents has always been the issue.This is a simple and clear procedure. For the following deals we can discuss different procedure.Please let us know your thoughts,
All the best,
Felix Eimer
________________________________________
From: Firstar [mailto:fe@firstar.eu]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 12:52 PM
To: pedro@onesafara.com; dancor.spies@gmail.com; ‘Nyasha Onesafara International’; dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: hagemann@firstar.eu
Subject: …
We agreed a small test quantity (low transport costs) with the procedure cash against documents for the first transaction in order to build up a mutual level of trust.
For the future b**** transaction we can follow a different procedure.
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 4:09 PM
To: ‘Firstar Europe ‘; ‘nyasha@onesafara.com’; ‘pedro@onesafara.com’
Cc: ‘fe@firstar.eu’
Subject: RE: Counter Offer
Dear Mr. Hageman, Mr. Eimer,
I wish to point out to you that;
1. The previous FCO, with the discount of 12% as well as a quantity difference was for another transaction from a different supplier and with no relation to the current transaction as well as terms and conditions that was not acceptable to you at the time.
2. The CIF versus FOB cost implication to the overall cost of sales, obviously have a serious effect to the bottom line.
3. Although you assure us that your company has the ability to purchase, we on the other hand have never dealt with your company thus we do not have firsthand experience of dealing with you. As you require proof of product before you pay, so we require proof of your ability to pay by means of a BCL.
4. We are still seriously concerned about the comment you made Mr. Eimer, during our Skype conversation, I quote verbatim; “[05/12/2008 11:11:37] Felix Eimer says: This happens for the delivery, I would be interested how you would react if behave on monday the same way for your payment and take our time.” As you can clearly see from this comment, we are now not sure with whom we really dealing with as this type of conduct is not appropriate to the status and stature of the perceived good standing of Firstar.
Please revert back to me as soon as possible
Regards
Dancor Spies
________________________________________From: felix eimer [mailto:felix.eimer@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 5:10 PM
To: D.Spies
Cc: fe@firstar.eu; Pedro del Campo; hagemann@firstar.eu; nyasha@onesafara.com
Subject: Re: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
The statement on skype how you WOULD feel if we WOULD behave the same way is now taken as an argument to discredit me and firstar. All parameters changed.nothing is as it was agreed.i think you don’t know with who you are dealing.everyone sees that this is just a plastic argument.i never has such strange deal in my whole business life.
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 8:47 PM
To: ‘felix eimer’
Cc: ‘fe@firstar.eu’; ‘Pedro del Campo’; ‘hagemann@firstar.eu’; ‘nyasha@onesafara.com’
Subject: RE: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
Dear Sir
I refer to your mail hereunder.
As a responsible businessman I need to evaluate and consider all aspects when dealing with such a high value commodity as gold. One of the most important and decisive factors are all the risks involved.
When I get confronted with a statement made by you, I regard this as a perceived threat and therefore a serious risk as we cannot afford a deliberate delay of payment in Zurich just because there was a delay in the delivery of the consignment. Apart from the fact that it is a childish argument, I needed you to clarify that specific concern, in my previous mail to you, as the statement was made by you.
I really fail to see in which way this is used as an argument to discredit you or Firstar.
With regards to your comments that all parameters changed and nothing as it was agreed.
My question Sir;
1. What parameters changed? This is a new FCO with new parameters on offer that has nothing to do with any previous offers.
2. What agreement did you sign and when? As far as I am concerned, no agreement was ever signed by you or Firstar.
I interpret your further comment with regards to our lack of knowledge as to whom we dealing with as a treat. Am I correct to assume that this is a disguised threat?
I refer to your comment with regards to the “plastic argument” as well as the”strange deal”.
Sir, the deal is straight forward, either you accept the deal, or you reject the deal. As simple as that.
Die Verhandlung ist nicht schwierig. Sie entweder Sie nehmen es an, oder Sie weisen es zurück. So einfach wie das.
Why are you argumentative as well as insulting and threatening us for no reason whatsoever?
Regards
Dancor Spies
________________________________________
From: felix eimer [mailto:felix.eimer@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 5:12 PM
To: D.Spies
Cc: fe@firstar.eu; Pedro del Campo; hagemann@firstar.eu; nyasha@onesafara.com
Subject: Re: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
We invited you to zuerich that you can see the bank docs four weeks ago.you told us that this is not necessary because of our board of directors and company profile
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 5:52 PM
To: ‘felix eimer’
Cc: ‘fe@firstar.eu’; ‘Pedro del Campo’; ‘hagemann@firstar.eu’; ‘nyasha@onesafara.com’
Subject: RE: ZÜRICH Time Schedule
Dear Sir
I refer to your mail hereunder.
I fail to see the relevance of your reference to the mail I sent you on 2008/12/1 and your invite extended to us to visit Zurich.
Sir, please be reasonable. Do you really expect us to fly to Zurich (10 to 12 hour flying time), inspect documents that, for all intents and purposes in this hi-tech world we live in be fabricated, not that I say that it would be, whilst the secure handling of information of the www is common cause, overnight in Zurich and then fly back to our origin the following day or whenever there is a flight available at a very high cost to ourselves.
To me, that constitutes a shoddy business decision.
In all fairness, all we require is that we need to satisfy ourselves that you in fact have the ability to pay, as you want surety that we are able to deliver what we say. I really fail to see the difficulty in this equation.
Why are you creating an argument?
I refer to the mail I sent you on 2008/12/01, as attached by you hereunder and more specifically to the 3rd last paragraph.
“As discussed during our conference call, it is very important for us to do everything by the book with no room for errors.”
Kind regards
Dancor Spies
________________________________________
De: Firstar Europe [mailto:hagemann@firstar.eu]
Enviado el: sábado, 06 de diciembre de 2008 16:16
Para: zoe@zoesaenz.com
Asunto: WG: Counter Offer
Make your own opinion.
Bernd Hagemann
Vice President
Europe – United Kingdom
215 Wilderspool Causeway
Warrington – Cheshire
WA4 6QE United Kingdom
Phone: + 44 161 480 25 22
Skype: firstar.europe
E-mail: info@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.eu
________________________________________
From: zoe saenz [mailto:zoe@zoesaenz.com]
Sent: 06 December 2008 18:50
To: ‘Firstar Europe ‘; dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: nyasha@onesafara.com; pedro@onesafara.com
Subject: RE: Counter Offer
Dear Felix,
The followings are my points as far as this negotiations:
1.- The Disc offered to Firstar was based at 12% FOB; But, now the disc is 6% CIF. This makes a big difference transporting Au is very costly.
2.-I t is a very well common practice to required from the Buyers a BG ( to be honest I’m not one that trust a lot BCL, will prefer Mt 7990.)
At the present time I will like to also paste a threat made to my person, sine it is beginning to be a common practice in this negotiations :
[17:08:08] firstar.europe dice:i receive a “new” Fco now with 6 % discount, last week the same FCO with 12 % discount LAST WEEK WAS FOB PRICE … BIG DIFFERENCE
QUESTION: HAVE YOU RESPONDED TO THE FIRST FCO BY SIGNING AND SEALING IT IN ORDER TO VERIFY YOU ARE IN ACCORD WITH THE DOCUMENT?
[17:08:15] firstar.europe dice:this is not serious – I agree on this point , FCO shall be signed and returned to the seller ….
[17:08:28] firstar.europe dice:we will blacklistet now all people involved – UNNECESARRY THREATS… YOU WILL NEVER GET TOO FAR THREATENING PEOPLE THIS WAY…
.
[17:08:59] firstar.europe dice:in 1 hour the blacklist is online, This business is not serious— YOU ARE RIGHT… THREATS ARE A THING OF THE PAST
.
[17:09:25] firstar.europe dice:You talk with Mr. Hagemann, sorry – AND…….? IS HE GOING TO SIGN THE FCO’S THAT HAS BEEN SENT TO HIM? AND REQUEST A
NON OPERATIVE DOCUMENT FROM HIS BANK?
IF ALL DOCUEMNTS ARE FORWARDED AS THE PROCEDURES STATES TO THE SELLER , THEN THIS NEGOTIATION WILL COME TO TERM. MEANWHILE, WITH
ALL THIS GOING BACK AND FORTH IT IS NOT GOING TO MAKE THINGS HAPPEN.
[17:11:10] zoe saenz dice: please, do whatever you want to do, but, my advise to nyasha was not to deal wIthout a BG,,, we have no idea when this gold gets into destination if we are going to be paid,
[17:09:34] zoe saenz dice: excuse me ,but this is business And, I as mentioned over and over again let’s start this from the beginning. You asked me to intervene in this transaction; But, we must start from zero and realized that as soon as a Bank instrument is received I will travel to Zurich to conclude this ‘’negotiations’’…
Also , please , once and for all we are all grown- ups let behave !!!!! NO MORE INSULTS!!!
Regards,
Zoe
________________________________________
From: Firstar USA [mailto:usa@firstar.eu]
Sent: 06 December 2008 23:47
To: pedro@onesafara.com; nyasha@onesafara.com; dancor.spies@gmail.com
Cc: hagemann@firstar.eu; fe@firstar.eu; felix.eimer@googlemail.com
Subject: International Blacklist now online
Sirs, Madams,
We inform you that Firstar Group in USA put the following persons and Companies into the International Blacklist.
Mr. Dancor Spies (with Details)
Mr. Pedro del Campo (with passport)
Mrs. Nyasha del Campo (with picture)
Mr. Ilunga Ngeoi (with passport)
Mr. Sumaili Kikoko (with passport)
Mrs. Joice Mujuru (with picture)
Mrs. Zoe Saenz (with picture)
Mr. Theofilius Faber
Company Tau Holdings Ltd.
Company Berline Equities Corporate
Company Onesafara International
At Friday, December the 12th 2008 we inform the ICC-Crime Office in Paris, the Crime Office of the Treasury Department in Washington DC, the FBI, the US-Senator Mr. Bill Grant and the former governor of Florida Mr. J.W. Mixson.
We have all the original gold documentation from the Congo:
Certificate of Origin
Autorisation D´exploitation No.ZA 5532TG
Department Provincial Du Katanga
OFIDA (Volet 3 Bureau)
3 FCO´s
your Agreement with the Ilunga Ngeoi (11 Pages, of 3700 Kilo) made by Miller and Company in Nairobi
all E-mails from Mrs. Nyasha del Campo, Pedreo del Campo and Dancor Spies
The documents were sent to us by Mrs. Nyasha del Campo. We will send all the paperwork on Friday directly to the government and to the FBI to check your “Offer”.
If you need our Address for court Action: http://www.firstar.us/court
Firstar International Group
Firstar Europe Ltd.
Office Washington DC
Evening Star Building
1101 Pennsylvania Avenue
5th floor, Washington DC 20004
Phone: +1 202 436 99 88
E-mail: usa@firstar.eu
Web: http://www.firstar.us
________________________________________
From: D.Spies [mailto:dancor.spies@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 2:16 PM
To: ‘hagemann@firstar.eu’; ‘Firstar USA’
Cc: ‘fe@firstar.eu’; ‘felix.eimer@googlemail.com’; ‘pedro@onesafara.com’; ‘nyasha@onesafara.com’; ‘zoe saenz’
Subject: RE: International Blacklist now online
Dear Mr. Hagemann
I am in receipt of an email, as can be seen hereunder, from a person [usa@firstar.eu] that did not have the common courtesy to provide us with his/her name.
For the ease of reference as well as for the sake of persons receiving a copy of this mail (Bcc) and not familiar with the contents of the previous emails as referred to hereinafter, I have included copies of same at the bottom of this mail. Please read from the bottom up.
I refer to the mail hereunder as well as all the emails sent to you and Mr. Felix Eimer.
To summarize;
1. Contact with you was made resulting in a Full Corporate Offer (FCO) being sent to you.
2. You rejected the FCO based on the fact that it called for Free On Board (FOB), but still pursued and harassed Mrs. Del Campo on a constant basis. Despite subsequent undertakings from you and Mr. Eimer, you persisted in doing so. You then started with your threats to blacklist us.
3. This FCO, based on a specific consignment, did not materialize and died a natural death, together with all supporting documents. (As refer to in the mail hereunder)
4. We further encountered numerous problems, which took us time to resolve, with Deutche Bank in New York, Citi Group as well as Chase Bank in the transfer of funds to enable us to deliver a new consignment on a Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) basis as per your requirement. Ample recorded evidence exists to fully verify this. Please note that the problems did not occur in any African Bank.
5. I personally gave you and Felix Eimer via Skype, constant feedback as to the progress of the process. We furthermore agreed that we will only start the process once our problems were solved with regards to the banks.
6. We sent you a new FCO on Friday 5 December based on a new consignment also with the main criteria CIF and not FOB as well as a discount of 6% as well as a requirement for you to provide us with a Bank Comfort Letter (BCL).
7. You discussed this new FCO with a person unrelated to this transaction and in this communiqué already issued serious threats to blacklist all the people involved. Pertinent to note that these threats were made before a counter offer was made to us.
8. You rejected the FCO and made a counter offer on 6 December with your main condition a discount of 10% (ten percent) and method of payment by means of a Telegraphic Transfer (TT) which you later altered per email to Cash against Documents.
9. I replied to your counter offer in which I also raised my concerns with regards to a perceived threat made by Mr Eimer and needed clarification of same.
10. Instead of addressing my concerns, Mr Eimer, literary minutes later, then embarked on a barrage of derogatory, insulting, threatening and totally unprofessional emails (of which you received all copies) and which I cannot otherwise but accept that you indeed sanctioned his rhetoric.
11. I again had queries which you again failed to address, instead received this latest mail as can be seen hereunder.
We have throughout our dealings with you, observed the rules and guidelines as set out by the International Chamber of Commerce.
Furthermore, we are ready, willing and able to conclude the transaction up to its full extent and final conclusion as we have all legitimate paperwork, permits, licenses as well as the certified product ready for shipment. All you needed to provide, apart from a Letter of Intent and the signed Agreement, was a BCL, to enable us to confirm and verify that you indeed are who you say you are, as well as that you have the ability to pay for the consignment. Refere
This dancour guy can take his emails and try and fool someone else. The mere fact he is doing business with someone accused of crimes against humanity in Zimbabwe says it all. He is a scallywag himself and willing to turn a blind eye to murder and abuse of state power and resources by his business partners.
We shall remember his name when the day of judgement comes. Spain signed the Treaty of Rome, by the way.
They say matsotsi haagerane but these are crooks who are trying to pull the wool over each others’ eyes.
I still don’t get why internal emails between the Mujuru camp should have the other party (firstar copied in. Are these emails genuine at all.
For those who don’t want to waste their time reading the bull**** above I can summarise itfor you.
The Mujuru’s approached someone claiming to have gold for sale, running into lots of kilos (3700 or so mentioned above). The other camp wants to take delivery of it before paying for it but the Mujuru camp want paying before delivery. The Mujuru’s ask for an effective bank guarantee letter to show they can pay and the buyers say they can’t send via the net so why don’t they meet in Zurich and they can see the documents of the company proving they are legit, in the meantime they also propose the Mujuru’s come with a small sample (50kilos here vakomana? vatadza kunyepawo futi mhani) and they can do a small initial deal to build trust. The Mujuru’s don’t have 50 kilos clearly and start delaying citing cash problems, banks had mistakes on paying taxes etc. The other party gets suspicious and starts to threaten interpol or ICC involvent whatever it may be plus using the political clout of their directors. The Mujurus are not moved but strangely enough want to continue with the deal, either to avoid the blacklist they’ve been threatend with or to give the impression they have the gold and if they don’t accept it someone else will, somewhere.
My own summation of this: Remember Ari Ben Menashe? He was sent by Bob and co to give an impression. Well this is from the ZANU PF book of kurasisa muvengi. This issue is probably known in financial circles in Europe by now and they should be aware. Mugabe wants to give the impression he has over 3000kilos of gold to trade with a willing buyer. Mugabe doesn’t have this gold. If he had it would have gone to the Chinese to pay for the weapons he got FOB, as they say.
I really love your blog!!
Can anybody tell me what