ZIMBABWE: Global Fund Moves to Safeguard Money from GONO

Sakhile Malaba on Jul 2nd, 2009 and filed under Health & Well Being. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

aids-patientHARARE, 2 July 2009 – Government officials in Zimbabwe are unhappy about a decision by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to ditch the National AIDS Council (NAC) as the principal recipient of its existing and future grants and to instead channel funds through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

Since the formation of the Global Fund in 2002, the country has received grants in Rounds 1, 5 and 8 of funding. UNDP will take over management from the government-controlled NAC in the final phase of the Round 5 grant and the recently approved Round 8 grant, totalling about US$169 million.

The Global Fund is one of the few remaining international donors supporting Zimbabwe’s HIV/AIDS interventions, and the Round 8 money is expected to bring much needed relief to the ailing public health sector.

Seven months ago, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) admitted diverting over US$7 million from the Global Fund’s Round 5 grant, earmarked for scaling up the national antiretroviral (ARV) programme.

As a result, efforts to decentralize ARV treatment from hospitals to rural health centres were set back, and many HIV-positive people were unable to access treatment or had to change drug regimens when the money to purchase ARV supplies failed to materialize.

The RBZ eventually returned the money, but the breach of trust is one of the likely reasons for the Global Fund’s decision to stop channelling funds through the NAC. The bank will also no longer oversee the accounts of the non-governmental organizations that are sub-recipients of Global Fund grants.

Deputy Minister of Health Douglas Mombeshora said he understood that the Global Fund wanted “quick implementation of programmes and greater accountability”, but worried that making UNDP the principal recipient would stall programmes because funds would have to go through the UN agency’s offshore accounts.

“What this means is that each time the NAC – or any other organizations that are sub-recipients of the Global Fund money – want anything, they must go through the UNDP,” he told IRIN/PlusNews.

“The UNDP will look for suppliers of whatever it is that is required; after finding the supplier the UNDP will then order, and after it receives supplies, forward them to NAC.” A better solution would have been to “capacitate” reputable local organizations to handle the grants, he suggested.

Dr Tapuwa Magure, Director of the National AIDS Council, in oral evidence to the parliamentary committee on health and child welfare, agreed that the handover from the NAC to UNDP would delay grant disbursement, hampering programme implementation. He described the development as “retrogressive”.

But HIV/AIDS activist Chitiga Mbanje told IRIN/PlusNews it was preferable to have greater accountability from the UNDP than no funds at all through the central bank and the NAC.

“For a central bank to dip its fingers into the coffers of people living with HIV … is the most unforgivable thing an institution could have ever done,” he said.

“Grant disbursements, even with the NAC as principal recipient, were extremely slow because there were so many political issues at play – it wasn’t as smooth as these officials now want to put it. The most important thing is that from now on, grant money will reach the people who need it most.”

Insiders said that Global Fund officials were already in Zimbabwe to oversee the handover process. NAC and UNDP officials would visit all the districts that had benefited from Global Fund grants and take stock of all assets bought with grant money since the first disbursement in 2002.

More than 320,000 people in Zimbabwe are in need of ARV treatment; of the 1.7 million living with HIV, only about 150,000 are obtaining ARVs from the public health sector.

Email This Email This

Related Posts


4 Responses for “ZIMBABWE: Global Fund Moves to Safeguard Money from GONO”

  1. big dave says:

    This is a good move , we all welcome it. Noone must ever trust Zanu PF run institutes with anything especially money, NO NO NO. Gono and his other cronies must face the harsh realities of acountability and transparency. This kiya kiya thing must go, they must start treating Zimbabwean as pple the same way they wld want to be treated. VIVA GLOBAL FUND!!!!

  2. Ebagum says:

    Mugabe plans retaliation for refusal to lift sanctions

    ZIMBABWE – HARARE – President Robert Mugabe is planning to seize dozens of British companies in Zimbabwe following the staunch refusal by Western governments to lift targeted sanctions imposed on him and his cronies.

    Senior officials in Zanu (PF), the party led by the 85-year-old veteran politician, who faces growing international condemnation for his crackdowns on political opponents, white farmers and independent journalists, say he is furious that foreign governments had refused to give Tsvangirai assurances that they would lift sanctions that have hit hard the top brass in his party.

    A leading member of the president’s Zanu (PF) party warned that Mugabe planned to retaliate for the intransigence of Western governments and alleged that the refusal was at Britain’s instigation – with other Western capitals taking a cue to maintain a ban on travel to European Union countries and America.

    According to the Southern African Business Association, there are about 100 British companies in Zimbabwe, with a total investment of hundreds of millions of pounds.

    Some of the big players, such as Barclays Bank, BP and Cadbury, are considered too vital to the economy to be nationalised. But scores of family businesses, many of them in tourism, could be confiscated and distributed among Mugabe’s party faithful, the sources said.

    Mugabe and the generals were said to be “extremeley agitated” and angered over EU and America’s decision to remove lifting “smart sanctions” targeted at Mugabe and his closest associates, and refusing to unfreeze their bank accounts

    Tobias Musvetu, a war veteran and political commentator, said a plan to grab British business assets had existed since the early days of Mugabe’s guerilla offensive against the Rhodesian authorities.

    “The idea was that we would seize power, take all the land from the white farmers and nationalise all white-owned businesses

  3. Realist says:

    @Ebagum.

    Yes I read the Zimtribune. It will be interesting to see how Europe and the US respond if he does.

    link: http://zimtribune.com/news_article.php?cat=17&id=221&t=1

  4. Ebagum says:

    Very interesting reading.

    http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=19249

Comments are closed

Advertisement

Recently Commented

Archives by Tag

Recent Entries

Copyright© 2007-2009 zimbabwemetro.com All rights strictly reserved.

Disclaimer: The information on this website is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees of accuracy and confers no rights. The Metro Blogs section does not necessarily represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of the publication. It is solely the opinions of the respective authors.

Terms and Conditions | About Us | Comment Policy | Privacy
Advertise | Contact Us