Comments on: Obama Tells World of Gukurahundi Massacres

By: Deliwe Nkabinde

Deliwe Nkabinde — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:20:53 +0000

Reading through some of Abel’s comments, it is easy to see which side he is. For example when he writes about the Gukurahundi massacres of the Matebele people he does so in the negative…’I don’t support the massacre, but…’. Elsewhere, somehow in a perveted way, he tries to lend ligitimacy for the killing, by citing an indulgent hypothetical scenario of what ZAPU would have done to the Shona people had they won the control of the state. I would ask him, why this fantacy with so much suffering caused by his paymasters. I think he and people of his ilk should hang their heads in shame for their obsenities.

By: Abel

Abel — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:45:46 +0000

Does this comment from muzezuru not qualify as hate speech r editor or is it fine if the missiles are targetted at Mugabe?

By: Muzezuru

Muzezuru — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:01:49 +0000

Mugabe and his cronies will die soon, they soonwill, they must.

By: Abel

Abel — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:26:17 +0000

True sori Maningi.

By: Sori Maningi

Sori Maningi — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:22:13 +0000

What you are comparing Abel are 2 different things. Support for a particular gvt or individual by another regime depends on the policies of that regime. A new regime might have different views and therefore may alter stance of the previous regime regarding that support that country has for whoever, whereas debts incurred by a particular regime will make the whole country indebted even if a new regime comes in.

By: Abel

Abel — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:12:16 +0000

I said Mugabe must pay smiths bills sori maningi. Likewise whoever takes over from Mugabe will pay the bills.

By: Sori Maningi

Sori Maningi — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:09:19 +0000

Abel what you are saying is Mugabe must be blamed for the evils that Ian Smith did!

By: Abel

Abel — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:48:19 +0000

Realist, there is no way you can refuse responsibilities of actions of a previous regime. Smith left us a bill of USD800 which has balooned to USD 8 billion over the years. That money was used to kill us during the bush war but we are the ones paying it. Tough luck for Mugabe and tough luck for Obama. They must be men enough and own up.Ukagara nhaka baba vako, zvikwereti zvavo ndezvakowo.If by some miracle Morgan rules Zimbabwe, he will have to pay the debts incurred by Mugabe yet the money was used to bash MDC-T’s teeth in.
So mr Realist you are right,Mugabe must pay up and the institutions are not obliged to give him any more money.

By: Realist.

Realist. — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:16:09 +0000

Well Abel……here we are again.!!

You as an apologist for a Dictator and myself as Devils advocate for a perceived weak leader.

You responded to Sori Manning and referred to the fact that Obama is bound by the previous administrations debts.

I will remind you of the debts accrued by president Mugabe over the last 18 years to at least 4 international institutions which he has refused to acknowledge. The current freeze on balance of payments support, Development aid etc is direct a result of that stupid stance.

By: Abel

Abel — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:03:13 +0000

Sori maningi but like your name sori maningi. You need to try harder than that. Next you will be telling us that Obama is not obliged to pay debts incurred under the Bush administration.